The culture of enablers

Also striking in this whole fiasco around Steve’s health is the response from the Apple faithful. Check out the comments on this blog for a representative sample. Criticize the PR operation at Apple, or Dear Leader himself, and the Apple faithful swarm out in droves to call you a traitor or worse. My email inbox has even worse stuff. Or check out blogs like this one which is called “i drank the kool-aid” (ahem) and which now has become devoted to bashing me.

Friends, I’m sorry, but you’re enablers. Steve Jobs behaves like a spoiled child and you not only tolerate it, you defend it. Apple PR is arrogant, rude, and then stumbles trying to handle a textbook PR situation — the kind of situation that occurs pretty regularly in the business world, and the reason that companies have PR departments in the first place — and you defend that too. You refuse to hold Apple to the same standards as every other company.

I’ll say this again. I admire Apple. I love its products. I have a house full of them. I love many of the people in the Mac community too.

I can even understand why Apple faithful overlook the shortcomings of a new Apple product, or look the other way when Apple produces a dud.

But it’s another thing to put up with being lied to and insulted. The reason Steve Jobs and Apple get away with this behavior is that nobody has ever held them accountable for their actions.



A PR veteran assesses Apple’s performance

Funny thing about Apple is that the company generally gets high marks for the way it manages communications, sticks to its message, remains consistent, maintains its brand image and so forth. But people in the PR business, and reporters who cover Apple, generally don’t think much of the way the company manages PR. “Say nothing” isn’t really a PR strategy — it’s an absence of a PR strategy. When times are good, when the company is on a roll, you can get away with it. The real test of a PR operation, however, is how it handles rough patches. I asked a veteran PR guy what he makes of how Apple has handled the situation around Steve’s health. His first response was, “Not well.” The rest of his message:

In general, you want to do a couple of things:

1. Own your own news.

2. Get all the news out at once and declare an end to the news cycle.

Apple hasn’t done either of these things — if what is being reported currently is true, then they’ve gone through several cycles of news for no reason at all – could’ve gotten all the news out and been done with it.

The reason they haven’t is because of what you noted in your blog — they have a culture of secrecy that is so profound that it colors what they do. Taking one step toward sharing information is thus dangerous.

Also, seems like Steve really believes this is a private matter — and I could make that argument as well. So those two things together are driving their decision making.

The last paragraph is the key one. You can make the case that Steve’s health is a private matter. If so, then make that case and stick to it and live with the consequences. The waffling and walk-backs and staged leaks and off-the-record comments only make things worse.



Imagine if any other CEO pulled bullshit like this

Here’s an interesting experiment. Imagine what the reaction would be if a different CEO, one who isn’t worshipped as a man-god by a small but vocal portion of the world’s population, did what Steve Jobs just did to Joe Nocera. Imagine, for example, that instead of Steve Jobs we were talking about Steve Ballmer.

Imagine Ballmer appeared in public having lost an incredible amount of weight, looking seventy years old and about one hundred and twenty pounds. Imagine that Ballmer’s flacks at first said he’d had a “common bug,” but when nobody bought that line (since it was absolutely totally ridiculous) they came back and said he’d been on the South Beach diet, or the vegan version of the Zone, and then when that didn’t fly they said that it wasn’t anyone’s business why Ballmer looked like shit, and when that didn’t work they lined up some “sources” to leak word that ooooh, yeaaaaah, you know come to think of it we just remembered that Ballmer underwent some pretty hairy surgery a while back and then developed a pretty hairy infection, and then, when the hacks still wouldn’t back off, Ballmer called a business columnist out of the blue, opened by insulting him, and then said he wanted to answer the columnist’s questions — but only off the record.

Imagine, seriously, the response if Microsoft pulled shit like this. Or any company. Imagine Jeffrey Immelt at GE doing this. Or Alan Mulally at Ford. Or Rupert Murdoch. Can you imagine any of those guys, or any of those companies, behaving in this way? Of course not.

Here’s the thing. If you want to appear in public looking like shit, and you insist on offering no explanation for the way you look, because you believe your privacy is more important than your company’s stock price, then fine. That’s a reasonable position. So do that. Stick to your principles, shut the fuck up, and let the stock do what it’s going to do. But don’t try to have it both ways. Don’t pull this crap with leaks and off-the-record conversations. Either answer the question, out loud, in public, or don’t. And don’t act like it’s people’s fault for wanting to know what’s going on with a guy who looks so awful, especially given his history.

I admire Apple. I love its products. But this is bullshit.



Steve Jobs Opening Line Generator

At long last it’s here. Simple pull-down menus let you create your very own Steve Jobs opening line. Hilarious. And addictive. Much love to the geniuses at GeekCulture.com, and to Dear Reader Robert for the tip.



PR Rule #1: People who are telling the truth about themselves do not insist on being ‘off the record’

Best part of Joe Nocera’s article from yesterday’s New York Times (“Apple’s Culture of Secrecy”) was, of course, the quote from Steve Jobs, the one where Nocera picks up the phone and Jobs hits him with this opening line: “This is Steve Jobs. You think I’m an arrogant [expletive] who thinks he’s above the law, and I think you’re a slime bucket who gets most of his facts wrong.”

In other words: Classy.

And just the kind of thing you’d expect from the CEO of a large, publicly traded company, right?

One thing that stuck with me was the expletive. I keep wondering, which word did he use? My picks, in no particular order, would be dick, prick, fuck or fucker. Maybe he used something bland, like bastard, but from what I’ve heard about Jobs, I doubt it.

It also struck me as classic Jobs, in that what he said was rude and obnoxious but also, oddly enough, highly perceptive. In one sentence Jobs managed to speak the essential truth about himself and Joe Nocera.

How many times do you think Jobs rehearsed that opening line before he dialed (or had Katie Cotton dial for him)? I’d say he practiced it one hundred times. And I’d say Katie was definitely on the line with him, though she probably pretended not to be. Furthermore, I’d bet a signed dollar bill that Apple recorded the phone call, just in case Nocera decided to run the stuff that Steve gave him under their “off the record” agreement.

That agreement by the way is worth a look as well. Why wouldn’t Jobs just tell Nocera on the record that ”while his health problems amounted to a good deal more than `a common bug, they weren’t life-threatening and he doesn’t have a recurrence of cancer,” as Nocera reported?

I’m always suspicious of off-the-record demands, especially in cases like this, and I’m not sure Nocera should have agreed to it. What he produces is a kind of denial that isn’t really a denial. Clearly Jobs and Apple want to get out the message that Steve is okay. They want to protect the stock. They were clearly freaked out about what Nocera might say in his column.

If Nocera had simply refused to go off the record, the burden would have remained on Jobs to get his message out and to do it openly or suffer continued hits to Apple stock. By going off the record, Nocera let himself get played by Jobs and Apple. Consider this. What if Jobs is lying? I’m not saying he is. But gods have been known to lie, especially when dealing with mere mortals. Think of how Zeus looked upon humans and you get an idea how Jobs views pretty much everyone in the world who isn’t Steve Jobs.

If Apple lies in a press release, or if its CEO lies in an on-the-record statement, the company has problems. But if everything was off the record, who’s to know? Or maybe you don’t exactly lie but you kind of hint at something and shade the conversation and lead someone to believe something even without explicitly saying that thing.

If down the road it turns out Steve was lying and someone from the SEC or some lawyer in a civil suit wants to find out what was said in that conversation, they’ll have to subpoena Joe Nocera, and the New York Times will fight that request. Even if Joe Nocera wants to tell the world what Steve Jobs told him, he can’t. He made a deal. He went off the record. Even if Steve turns out to be lying, Joe Nocera is stuck.

Thus Steve Jobs gets to protect his stock price and give Wall Street the message that he wants them to hear, and should any of this turn out not to be true, well, Steve and Apple now have Joe Nocera and the legal department of the New York Times to act as their ally and firewall.

Nice work, Joe Nocera. You’ve now become part of Apple’s PR machine.

So why did Joe Nocera agree to be Steve’s patsy? Well, there was the element of surprise. Apple PR didn’t set up the interview in advance and give him time to think about the ground rules and what the implications might be. Instead they did an ambush. Companies do this sometimes. I’ve had it happen. It’s always a sign that something’s not kosher. The CEO calls you up out of the blue and you’re knocked back on your heels, scrambling to find a pen and wondering what you should ask, and when he says he wants to talk off the record or he’ll hang up right now you think, Jeez, I’ve got the guy on the phone, I might as well let him talk, I’ve got him halfway over the gunwale and into my net, I’m not going to risk throwing him back.

So maybe that’s a factor. But Joe Nocera is a veteran. He’s a pro. He knows that the ambush call is a sure sign that something’s not right. These calls are never legit. They’re never truly an impulse call. Guys like Jobs do not just pick up a phone and call a reporter on an impulse. Ever.

Nocera also knows why guys like Jobs play the off-the-record game, and he knows that it’s the surest way to get pwned by a source. So he had to be suspicious about Jobs calling him out of the blue and then demanding to speak off-the-record. It’s one thing when someone wants to go off the record to talk about someone else — their boss, their neighbor, their colleague. If someone inside the Bush administration wants to tell you something but doesn’t want to lose their job, that’s one thing.

But people who want to set the record straight about themselves don’t go off the record. They don’t need to. They don’t want to.

So why did Nocera agree to this lousy deal? My sense is he figured that while he might not get the truth, he would at least get something, and even if it’s all bullshit it would still be the hottest story of the week and put him ahead of everyone else on this and produce the one story that everyone else would be talking about for the next few days. In which case, okay, mission accomplished.

But the Nocera story doesn’t necessarily help shareholders, because, let’s remember something: We still haven’t heard Steve Jobs or anyone at Apple say, on the record, that Steve isn’t sick.

What we have heard is Apple telling the world first that Steve had a “common bug.” Now they’re walking back that lie, in baby steps. First we got a leaked story about surgery to John Markoff of the Times, and now an ambush off-the-record call to another Times columnist. Still nothing that can be attributed to Apple or for which Apple can be held responsible.

What we’ve also heard is Steve Dowling, the #2 flack at Apple, repeat the phrase, “Steve’s health is a private matter. Steve’s health is a private matter.” Dowling is a Boston native and a Red Sox fan and a former hack, which means he’s a good guy, but there he is, doing the Apple PR robot act, repeating the same sentence over and over again, something no other company does and something that irritates the shit out of reporters, which is, I think, why the Apple flacks do it.

One of the many ironies and contradictions about Apple is that while the company presents this hip, open, cool image to the world, its PR machine is the most secretive, locked-down, hard-assed and disciplined of any company in tech, including IBM. To get a sense of how weird IBM is, consider that one time, while I was waiting for an elevator with a flack at IBM headquarters in Armonk, I asked, just to pass the time, if the guy ever did any jogging. The guy gave me this panicked look and said, “Why do you want to know?”

Apple is even weirder than that. They’ve set new records for secrecy and obfuscation and arrogance among tech companies. More important, these are not amateurs. These are hardcore PR people. They know the impression they’re creating when their CEO does an ambush call and then demands to be off the record. Yet they did it.

One unfortunate effect of Apple’s secrecy and general weirdness is that nobody believes anything Apple says anymore. I’d bet the hedge fund guys who were freaking out about Steve’s health last week are still freaking out. Maybe even more so.

Another unfortunate side effect of Apple’s secrecy is the message it sends to shareholders: Yes, we want your money, and no, we won’t tell you what’s going on inside our company. It’s a pretty common attitude in the Valley. Google has it. So does Yahoo. Facebook has it too, and they’re not even public yet.

The unfortunate thing about this arrogance is that no matter how hot a company may be, eventually every company stumbles. Someday Apple will need friends among the hackery. I’m not sure it will have any.



Borg’s new trick to get people to use Vista? Call it something else.

CNET reports that Borg marketeers have come up with yet another incredibly stupid trick sly strategy for getting people to use Vista. They find people who say they hate Vista and lure them into a demo of a “new operating system” which they call “Mojave.” The saps start raving about how great Mojave is. The Borg videotapes them raving. Then the Borgtards pull away the curtain (or something) and show the dupes that they’ve actually been using Vista.

Sound familiar? See this old advertisement:

ARVE Error: no video ID

As CNET reporter Ina Fried points out, the demo isn’t entirely fair, since, “To be sure, the focus groups didn’t have to install Vista or hook it up to their existing home network.”

New slogan for Vista: “Works great in a focus group demo room when installed and operated by Microsoft employees in a controlled hardware environment.”

Also, I’m no marketing guru, but it seems to me that those Folgers ads only made Folgers seem even cheesier. Microsoft can spend as much money as it wants on Vista ads. They’ll just be digging a deeper hole for themselves.



Valleywag blasts Katie Cotton

Violet Blue)

(Photo: Violet Blue)

See here. Valleywag, the gold standard for ethics, honesty and responsible behavior in the Valley, is blasting Apple uber-flack Katie Cotton (in photo above), saying she’s putting Steve Jobs’s needs ahead of the needs of Apple and its shareholders by not being forthright about Steve’s health. Money quote: “Cotton should remember this: She doesn’t actually work for Steve Jobs. She works for Apple’s shareholders. If it’s too late for her to start doing her job accordingly, then it’s time for her to go.”

But Katie is no doubt working furiously behind the scenes. For example I’d bet she had something to do with this story by John Markoff from the New York Times where “people who are close to Mr. Jobs” leaked that Jobs had surgery earlier this year and has had some side effects from that but otherwise is fine and cancer-free. (Note that it’s “people who are close to Mr. Jobs” saying this and not Apple itself, meaning there’s no accountability for Apple PR afterward should the whole thing later turn out to be only partially true. Note also that “people close to Mr. Jobs” do not speak to reporters without permission, ever.)

Which means what? Markoff is a great guy and knows tech better than almost any other reporter on the beat, but he’s also one of the reporters Apple views as friendly and trustworthy, which in the Valley means he can be counted on to play ball. Make of that what you will but there’s a reason this story leaked out in the Times and under Markoff’s byline, and it isn’t because he’s such a dogged, hard-nosed investigative reporter who’s breaking down doors to get at the truth. Ahem.

The guys doing that are the guys at the Journal. They must be going nuts trying to break this story. And they’re in league with those hedge fund guys whom they quoted anonymously earlier in the week, the ones who are considering hiring private detectives to trail Jobs.

You think it’s a coincidence that just as the Journal was breaking its story about hedge funds hiring private detectives, Markoff at the Times happened to run into some “people close to Mr. Jobs” who knew about Steve’s surgery and were willing to tell John Markoff all about it? Right. None of this is happening by accident. Apple PR is playing the Valley press corps, and the Valley press corps is going along with it, like they always do. Not so the hedge fund guys, who have real money at stake and don’t care if someone like Katie Cotton yells at them. Frankly I’d be shocked if the hedge fund guys didn’t already have people posted 24×7 at the Stanford Medical Center.

For what it’s worth, Markoff may be one of the only hacks left that Apple PR can count on. A couple of the guys at Fortune used to be considered friendly until their colleague Peter Elkind produced a botched hatchet job on Steve Jobs earlier this year. It’s likely that Apple has now gone dark on everyone at Fortune as a result. Goatberg is friendly to Apple but he’s a gadget guy and doesn’t do news, and anyway the Journal went after Jobs on options backdating so they’re likely on the Katie Cotton shit list too. Forbes? Um, right. Even before I created Fake Steve, Apple wouldn’t let anyone at Forbes do any interviews with anyone at Apple. We had a whole bureau in the Valley, 30 miles from Cupertino, and for ten years we didn’t set foot inside Apple. They’d send us review units and that’s it.

So Apple is down to one last friend in the Valley press corps — John Markoff at the Times – and he gets the “scoop” about the surgery. Funny old world isn’t it.



iJustine denied!

See the video here. Apple retailers have been given Justine Ezarik’s phone number and told to refuse her service. She calls 35 stores and they all tell her they’re sold out. Best part is where she gets an Apple salestard to call Steve Jobs “a big butthead.” Other best part is where Justine doesn’t recognize the Talking Heads song on the hold music. I scoffed at first, but then I realized why: The song she’s listening to (“This Must Be the Place”) was released the year before iJustine was born. Sigh. Nice to watch Justine grooving to the music though. Maybe she’ll even get the Talking Heads “Best of” album. Maybe I’ll even gift it to her from iTunes. The fact is, try as I might, despite everything about her, I can’t make myself dislike iJustine. I’m not sure what it is. I think it’s her eyes. Watch the video again and check out the way she does the “I’m shocked” thing over and over again. (As in the photo above.) She does this look all the time and the effect is to make her appear to be constantly startled by everything around her, as if she’s just fallen to earth from some other planet and everything she sees or hears is new and strange and shocking. Plus there’s that pink lip gloss. Yeah. That’s the ticket. Much love, Justine. And hey — call me. Okay? Daddy wants to buy you some classic rock.




My TalkingHeadTV.com interview

In case you’re wondering what really happened to the Fake Steve blog and why I shut it down, you can check out the videos posted on TalkingHeadTV.com. Special bonus is they also have a video interview with my very good friend Veronica Belmont. Worth a look.