By: ligtv

ligtv — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:58:03 +0000

Please continue. I nearly wet myself laughing while reading this. Additionally the comments on how much people whinge and bitch about it are fantastic too. lig tv izle bedava ligtv izle garibim deyimler şiir türleri

By: DeepCroak

DeepCroak — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:14:49 +0000

This off-the-record.
Screw the rest of the market. There’s some heavily-leveraged short positions taken by a couple of big money outfits. Whatever it takes, AAPL has to head down, at least until the positions get closed mid-October. With a 9-figure profit to look forward to, buying all kinds of hacks to drive the stock down is penny ante.

By: Sprizouse

Sprizouse — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:47:28 +0000

This is undergrad level finance stuff.

Which company’s stock is worth more? The one that just announced a brand new product or the one that just released a brand new product two weeks ago?

Or… think about it this way. You might have bought “Dark Knight” stock at $180 two months ago but would you buy it at $180 today, knowing it’s already earned most of its box office money?

The high point for (potential short-term) growth passed the minute iPhone v2 was released, so the stock declines. This is perfectly naturual. After all, Apple isn’t likely sell one million iphones in a weekend sometime in August are they? The stock will float until iJobs announces another fantastic new iProduct and the stock will get an iBump back to its previous iLevels.

By: Gianni

Gianni — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:39:16 +0000

Dare, I do think Dan has a point here. Although the market is not doing well, comparison over the same period with specific peer sets does not really support the "whole market tanking" view.

By: What is Apple? « Son of GeekTalk

What is Apple? « Son of GeekTalk — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:33:40 +0000

[...] by Gianni on July 29, 2008 Dan Lyons and Dare Obasanjo engage in an interesting debate whether the bad performance of AAPL is purely linked to the [...]

By: SamG

SamG — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:04:51 +0000

Dan,

It is too simplistic to claim that a PR-this or PR-that affected the stock price.

Instead, send an expedition to Intel PR dept to find out more about Intel Core Duo 2. Their product labels are confusing at best. Is Core Duo 2 at 1.8GHz faster than Core Duo at 2.4GHz? Is it Mama Mia faster or more like Uno, Duo, Tres, Duo kinda faster?

And what’s up with Penryn name? God of Pen-computing?

How about some clarity from Intel?

By: JSG

JSG — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:04:29 +0000

Now while obviously stockholders would LIKE to know about Dear Leader’s health… the man still has a right to his privacy.

If Cheney can have several heart attacks while VP and keep that secret (you didn’t REALLY buy the “secure undisclosed location” bullshit, did you?)… then I think Jobs can keep his health private too.

Privacy is not something you need executive privelege to have, despite the best efforts of conservatives to make it so.

By: Tuesday links: covering covered bonds « Abnormal Returns

Tuesday links: covering covered bonds « Abnormal Returns — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:57:30 +0000

[...] Why PR matters. Apple (AAPL) gets it from the market for PR blunders. (Real Dan Lyons) [...]

By: FBO

FBO — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:25:23 +0000

Sure, it’s happening all over. It’s just that in this instance, they have something else to jump on. Whether they should or not is another story. The fact is, it’s a question the investors and stockholders are able to use. And the fact that Apple isn’t answering them isn’t helping.

By: James

James — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:34:14 +0000

But, on the other hand, the weakness in the wider market is due to poor performance. Poor sales, poor financials, poor operations. Apple doesn’t suffer from those symptoms. They do have one “common bug”, poor corporate governance.

Comments on: Why PR matters